|
Review of Physicians Desk
Reference (PDR)
Indispensable but continues to be
highly flawed, August 7, 2004
Reviewer: Mark Cannon "Mark Cannon"
(Larchmont, NY)
The PDR is indispensable -- I'd be
lost without it -- but it's highly
flawed, and I can't believe that
after all these years, they can't
figure it out and do a better job. I
don't think it would be that hard.
Some aspects of the format are
problematic. It's hard to find
certain things, and often you won't
see what you're looking for even if
you land on the right paragraph.
Some examples:
(1) For some reason, side effects
are divided between two or more
different sections of each article.
I'm sure there's some logic to this,
but it certainly isn't evident, and
it makes it much harder to find out
what we want to know.
(2) Some important sections -- for
example, "Drug Interactions" -- are
hard to find, no matter how
experienced you are with the PDR.
One solution would be to have
boldface headings for such sections.
(3) How often have you wanted to
find "half-lives" of a medication
and perhaps its metabolites, and how
often have you actually found them?
They are there, but they're buried.
Something as important as this
should certainly be highlighted,
perhaps in tabular form.
The sad fact is that unless you're
quite persistent, you often won't
find a lot of what you're looking
for when you open the PDR, even
though it's there.
Some other flaws are probably
unavoidable. For example, despite
the fact that seemingly anything and
everything is mentioned as a
possible side effect for every
medication, common side effects
sometimes are not mentioned at all.
Also, oftentimes some of the major
uses for a given medication are not
mentioned. These problems aren't the
fault of the publisher. The first
reflects failures of the medical
literature in general -- if a side
effect isn't mentioned prominently
in the literature, it might not find
its way into the PDR. The second
reflects the fact that many correct
usages of medications are not
officially approved.
Some caveats for consumers: The
listed dosage ranges for any given
medication are sometimes too
limited. Lower or higher dosages may
be right for some people. And also,
do beware of those endless lists of
possible side effects. Remember that
these aren't necessarily things that
will happen; they only MIGHT happen.
(Many of them rarely if ever happen,
at least in terms of their being
caused by the medications.) And
sometimes the lists fail to include
things that DO happen! If you are
convinced that a medication has done
something to you and it's not
mentioned in the PDR, you still
could very well be right. But, don't
assume that something IS happening
just because it IS mentioned on that
endless list!
It's hard to express a simple
overall assessment of the PDR. The
book is an important reference, but
it's hard to understand that the
publisher hasn't figured out how to
do a better job. Maybe they'll read
this page and finally do it.
Content Courtesy : www.amazon.com
|